Sandra Schultz Newman
Home  •  Full CV  •  Mediation  •  Arbitration  •  Appellate Argument Preparation  •  Recent Articles  •  Contact
Justice Sandra Schultz Newman Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

ADR

Benefits of Arbitration:

CHOICE
The parties in the arbitration process decide jointly on the arbitrator; in litigation, a judge is appointed and the parties have little or no say in the selection.

CONFIDENTIALITY
The arbitration process is private between the two parties and informal, while litigation is a formal process conducted in a public courtroom.

SPEED
The arbitration process can be much faster than litigation. Once an arbitrator is selected, the case can be heard immediately. In civil litigation, on the other hand, a case must wait until the court has time to hear it; this can mean many months, even years, before the case is heard.

COST
The costs of arbitration are limited to the fee of the arbitrator(s) and attorney fees. Costs for litigation include many more hours of attorney fees and court costs, which can be very high.

FINALITY
In binding arbitration, the parties usually have no appeal option, unless there is a “manifest disregard of the law,” so the process has a finite end.

CONTROL OF EVIDENCE
The arbitration process has a limited evidence process, and the arbitrator controls what evidence is allowed, while litigation requires full disclosure of evidence to both parties. The rules of evidence do not apply in arbitration, so there are no subpoenas, no interrogatories, and no discovery process.

Arbitration

As attorneys, we understand the challenges in our court systems. Too often, we have to wait years before receiving trial dates. We feel frustrated by scheduling delays due to case filing backlogs, multiple motions, discovery arguments and more.

As a result, Alternative Dispute Resolution has become a desirable option for plaintiff and defense attorneys alike. With a well-qualified ADR professional, you can bring your client’s case to resolution more quickly and efficiently, saving significant time and money.

But sometimes it is also challenging to find an experienced arbitrator or mediator acceptable to both plaintiff and defense.

That is why Justice Sandra Schultz Newman has become a highly sought-after neutral for a wide range of arbitration issues. Justice Sandra Schultz Newman offers the depth of experience and unique perspective that comes from her work from both sides of the bench. As a former judge and justice as well as a litigator and assistant district attorney, Justice Sandra Schultz Newman is respected and highly qualified.  
Arbitration is a time-tested, cost-effective alternative to litigation in which parties submit the resolution of a dispute to one or more impartial persons for a final and binding decision.

Over the years that she served on the bench as a Judge for the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice, she developed a track record of equitable and balanced decisions. Her decisions were rarely appealed and when the few were, they were not overturned. 

When Justice Sandra Schultz Newman sits as an arbitrator, she also commands respect from clients. Knowing that she was a sitting Judge and Justice helps clients to feel confident that her arbitration decisions are objective and based on a solid legal understanding as well as principles of equity and fairness.

©2009 Justice Sandra Schultz Newman. All Rights Reserved. | email
website designed & powered by Websketching.com